FraudOptics, Author at FraudOptics

Crypto and Sports Betting: A Game-Changer with High Rewards and New Risks

Recent years have seen a seismic shift in the U.S. gambling landscape. Legal sports betting—once confined to a single state—has expanded into 38 states by 2024. Wagering volume similarly soared from $4.9 billion in 2017 to $121.1 billion in 2023, with 94% of bets last year placed online. As the industry evolves, crypto sports betting presents a strategic opportunity, offering the potential for greater efficiency, broader market access, and enhanced user experience. However, with this opportunity comes the need for careful navigation of regulatory compliance and fraud prevention measures.

1. Growth Drivers for Crypto in Gambling

Speed and Efficiency

Crypto transactions can settle more quickly and often at a lower cost than traditional payment methods. For online operators, offering instant deposits and withdrawals can enhance the bettor experience and streamline operations.

Stablecoins go a step further by representing a steady fiat value—most commonly pegged to the U.S. dollar—while preserving crypto’s efficiency. This approach mitigates the volatility seen in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum and provides a more familiar pricing structure for bettors. Popular stablecoins include USDT (Tether), which offers broad market liquidity but faces scrutiny over transparency; USDC (USD Coin), known for its regular attestations and backing by leading crypto companies; BUSD (Binance USD), which benefits from regulatory oversight via Paxos; and DAI, a decentralized stablecoin maintaining its value through over-collateralization of crypto assets. Adopting stablecoins can reduce the friction of traditional banking rails, help operators reach more users in different jurisdictions, and potentially lower transaction fees—all while keeping the user’s balance tied to a recognizable fiat benchmark.

Global Accessibility

Digital currencies transcend borders, enabling gambling operators to reach new international audiences without the usual complications of cross-border transactions. In regions where conventional credit cards or payment gateways face restrictions, crypto-based solutions offer an alternative, expanding the potential market for sportsbooks and casinos far beyond traditional banking rails.

Consumer Demand for Innovation

Industry surveys indicate that a significant portion of new sports bettors falls under the age of 30, reflecting growing interest among digital-native audiences. Many of these bettors show a marked preference for platforms that embrace innovative solutions such as cryptocurrency, viewing these features as a sign of a forward-thinking brand. In a 2022 American Gaming Association (AGA) report, younger demographics were highlighted as a key driver of online wagering growth—suggesting that crypto integration could serve as a vital differentiator for sportsbooks seeking to capture this emerging market.

Broader Range of Payment Methods

Incorporating cryptocurrencies alongside conventional payment options can help spread risk and limit reliance on any single banking channel or processor. In turn, this wider assortment of options may offer greater resilience against unexpected service interruptions or processing complications.

2. Emerging Challenges and Potential Misuse

While the benefits are clear, incorporating crypto into sports betting also presents operational and regulatory complexities:

Money Laundering Concerns

Digital assets, with their partial pseudonymity, can attract illicit actors. Criminals may attempt to funnel illegal funds through crypto-friendly betting platforms. Without robust safeguards, the line between legitimate and suspicious transactions becomes blurred.

Regulatory Patchwork

Although compliance obligations remain varied across local, state, and global jurisdictions, the recently introduced GENIUS Act provides much-needed clarity on stablecoin usage in the United States. Where rules once seemed ambiguous or fragmented, this legislation lays out a consistent federal framework—including 1:1 reserve requirements and comprehensive AML standards. For sports betting operators exploring cryptocurrency, this move can significantly reduce uncertainty, enabling better long-term planning while still requiring careful navigation of state-level variations.

Fraud & Scams

Rapid growth in crypto has been accompanied by phishing attacks, hacking incidents, and confidence schemes. Unsuspecting bettors or underprepared platforms could be targets, risking financial losses and reputational damage.

Responsible Gaming Implications

A study from UC San Diego highlights rising concerns about gambling addiction. Crypto’s round-the-clock availability and ease of transaction could add complexity to existing responsible-gaming strategies if not adequately addressed.

3. Mitigating Risks Through Strategic Measures

Enhanced KYC and AML Frameworks

Comprehensive Identity Verification

Thorough customer identification and verification procedures remain crucial. Reliable, tech-driven solutions can swiftly confirm a user’s real-world identity before allowing them to link crypto wallets to betting accounts.

Ongoing Transaction Monitoring

Automated monitoring systems can flag anomalies, such as rapid cycling of funds through multiple wallets or bets well above typical user limits. These systems often use AI to distinguish between legitimate high-rollers and potential money launderers.

Commercial Risk Intelligence

In an environment where digital transactions can cross numerous borders and cut across diverse asset types, Commercial Risk Intelligence Platforms help provide holistic oversight.

Network Analysis

By mapping transactions between businesses, individuals, and on-chain wallets, suspicious patterns—like collusion or large-scale money laundering—can be detected sooner.

Regulatory Alignment

These platforms often integrate multi-jurisdictional guidelines to ensure operators remain compliant as they expand into new states or international territories.

As an example, FraudOptics offers a global perspective on off-chain and on-chain relationships, enabling gambling operators and financial institutions to see the bigger picture of who’s transacting with whom, and how these connections might pose risks or reveal opportunities.

Cross-Industry Collaboration

Regulator Engagement

Establishing constructive relationships with gaming commissions and financial authorities can help clarify local requirements and encourage best practices.

Public-Private Partnerships

Collaboration with tech providers, law enforcement, and regulatory bodies fosters information sharing on suspicious activities, raising collective industry standards.

3. Outlook and Strategic Considerations

Regulatory Momentum

With the current U.S. presidential administration showing notable support for digital currencies—particularly stablecoins—there’s an increasing likelihood of more state-level initiatives specifically addressing crypto-based wagering. Sports betting platforms that anticipate these trends and align their operations accordingly can gain a meaningful advantage, benefiting both their reputation and regulatory standing as the market continues to expand.

Technological Advancements

As blockchain analytics tools mature, identifying risky wallet activities in Crypto Sports Betting will become more streamlined. This evolution should encourage broader adoption, with less friction on compliance requirements.

Risk vs. Reward

For businesses eyeing cryptocurrency adoption in sports betting, balancing innovation with robust safeguards is key. The right mix can create a sustainable competitive advantage in a booming market.

As more policy discussions surface around crypto-friendly frameworks, early adopters in the sports betting space can use this momentum to drive pro-crypto regulations that support their business model. Stepping in now—with well-structured compliance practices and innovative use of stablecoins—positions these operators to influence legislative dialogue, demonstrating firsthand how crypto can be responsibly integrated. By taking the lead, companies can not only capture a growing market of tech-savvy bettors but also shape a more permissive, forward-thinking environment for the entire industry.

Consumer Trust

Clear communication about security measures, responsible gaming, and transparency around crypto transactions can bolster user confidence. This sense of trust may prove decisive in attracting and retaining bettors.

3. Conclusion

While cryptocurrency integration into U.S. sports betting isn’t yet a widespread reality, its potential to streamline operations and connect with new audiences is undeniable. From near-instant transactions to reduced reliance on traditional payment methods, digital assets offer clear advantages in an increasingly competitive market. At the same time, borderless transactions and pseudonymous accounts can elevate the risks of fraud or money laundering—especially if not managed through robust KYC/AML protocols and modern risk intelligence tools. By proactively collaborating with regulators, technology partners, and industry peers to establish clear guidelines and safeguards, operators can transform what might otherwise be a formidable challenge into a strategic opportunity—one that could ultimately redefine the landscape of sports betting.

Cryptocurrency is driving new opportunities in sports betting, but it also brings heightened risks. FraudOptics enables you to harness the advantages of digital assets while managing threats through our integrated approach to on-chain and off-chain intelligence. We combine blockchain insights with real-world data to detect vulnerabilities early and uphold strong compliance standards. As the blockchain tells the story, FraudOptics provides the intel—a vital foundation for secure, responsible growth in the evolving betting industry.

Navigating Cryptocurrency Custody: The Critical Role of Off-Chain Data in a Post-SAB 121 Environment

A Whitepaper for Financial Institutions by FRAUDOPTICS on 03/18/2025

Introduction:

The recent regulatory shift marked by the SEC’s repeal of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121 presents a significant opportunity for financial institutions (FIs) to more confidently expand their services into the realm of cryptocurrency custody. This development allows financial institutions to expand their traditional scope and offer cryptocurrency products. The repeal of SAB 121 allows these entities to take custody of digital assets on behalf of their clients, unlocking new avenues for growth and innovation and expanding the cryptocurrency footprint into traditional finance. However, this expansion into the digital asset space necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the associated risks, particularly concerning the use of cryptocurrency illicit activities. While cryptocurrency has developed into the mainstream and the vast majority of uses are legitimate, cryptocurrency is still a vehicle for money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud and sanctions evasion The scale of these risks is significant, as evidenced by estimations of substantial cryptocurrency transactions linked to illicit purposes. To effectively mitigate these risks and ensure compliance, FIs must adopt robust risk management strategies that incorporate data beyond the blockchain itself.

The Inherent Limitations of On-Chain Analysis:

Blockchain technology, while providing a transparent record of transactions, alone offers limited visibility into the real-world identities and activities of participants. Relying solely on on-chain data can obscure the true nature of transactions and fail to identify connections to illicit activities such as money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanctions evasion. Transactional patterns alone are insufficient to understand the broader context of cryptocurrency usage. This limitation underscores the necessity of supplementing on-chain analysis with a more comprehensive approach. Expanding this visibility is the focus of FraudOptics. FraudOptics utilizes off-chain data to provide greater clarity and insight to on chain transactions, the participants, the beneficial owners and the crypto wallets that are utilized.

The Importance of Off-Chain Data for Effective Risk Mitigation:

To gain a holistic understanding of cryptocurrency risk, FIs must leverage off-chain data. FraudOptics is focused on precisely this conundrum. FraudOptics gathers information from

a wide range of sources, including web3 social platforms, data leaks, code repositories, sanctions lists, and the deep/dark web. By aggregating and analyzing this diverse data, institutions can establish a more complete picture of the entities and activities associated with cryptocurrency transactions.

Off-chain data provides crucial context, revealing connections and affiliations that are not visible on the blockchain. This information can help identify high-risk individuals and entities, detect potential vulnerabilities, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. For example, information gleaned from social media can expose associations with sanctioned individuals or groups, while data leaks can reveal compromised credentials and potential security risks. The ability to analyze code repositories can reveal malicious code that could be used for fraudulent activities.

Key Considerations for Cryptocurrency Custody in a Post-SAB 121 Environment:

The repeal of SAB 121 has created a new landscape for cryptocurrency custody, demanding a proactive approach to risk management. FIs should prioritize the following considerations:

– Enhanced Due Diligence: Implement comprehensive due diligence processes that incorporate both on-chain and off-chain data to assess the risk profiles of clients and counterparties.
– Continuous Monitoring: Establish robust monitoring systems that continuously track cryptocurrency transactions and associated off-chain data to detect suspicious activities and emerging risks.
– Regulatory Compliance: Ensure compliance with all applicable regulations, including AML, KYC, and sanctions requirements, by leveraging data-driven risk assessment tools.
– Custody Security: Implement robust security measures to protect custodied cryptocurrency assets, including multi-signature wallets, cold storage, and regular security audits.
– Data Integration: Develop the capability to integrate on-chain and off-chain data from diverse sources to create a unified risk assessment framework.

Building a Robust Risk Management Framework:

The successful adoption of cryptocurrency custody requires a robust risk management framework that prioritizes data-driven decision-making. FIs should invest in tools and technologies that enable them to effectively collect, analyze, and interpret both on-chain

and off-chain data. This includes leveraging AI and machine learning techniques to identify patterns and anomalies that may indicate illicit activity.

Furthermore, institutions should foster a culture of collaboration and information sharing, both internally and with external partners, to enhance their ability to detect and prevent cryptocurrency-related risks.

Conclusion:

The repeal of SAB 121 presents a significant opportunity for FIs to expand their services into the growing cryptocurrency market. However, this expansion must be accompanied by a comprehensive understanding of the associated risks and a commitment to robust risk management practices. By prioritizing the integration of off-chain data into their risk assessment frameworks, institutions can effectively mitigate the risks associated with cryptocurrency custody and ensure the safe and responsible adoption of digital assets.

FraudOptics Summary

FraudOptics was founded by former FBI/DOJ leaders and expert developers to combat illicit cryptocurrency activities. Our government-grade commercial risk intelligence solution uniquely integrates on-chain and off-chain data to untangle complex connections across blockchain wallets, businesses, and individuals. Using AI-driven analysis and labeling, we have curated a database of 141M+ labeled wallets, 301M+ off-chain tags, and 16M+ on-chain labels. Continuously updated through automation, our datasets provide current and dynamic insights. FraudOptics empowers compliance departments, financial institutions, corporations, exchanges, and government agencies to efficiently detect wallets linked to illicit activities like terrorism financing, fraud, money laundering, ransomware, and sanctions evasion. Our solution enables proactive risk mitigation and regulatory compliance, ensuring stakeholders access the most comprehensive and actionable intelligence available in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

For additional information contact: Ren McEachern | ren@fraudoptics.com

Disclaimer

Cryptocurrency remains a volatile ecosystem. Customers, purchasers, and participants should fully understand the risks before engaging in the use, investment, purchase or transmission of cryptocurrency.

Contact FraudOptics

Tornado Cash Sanctions and the Fifth Circuit’s Landmark Decision: Will OFAC Remove Tornado Cash Addresses from the SDN List?

Summary

– Landmark Court Ruling: The Fifth Circuit struck down OFAC’s designation of Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts, finding they are not “property” under IEEPA.

– Immutable vs. Mutable: The court distinguished immutable contracts (which cannot be altered or owned by anyone) from mutable ones; only the former fell outside OFAC’s sanctions scope.

– SDN List Status: Tornado Cash’s Ethereum addresses remain on the SDN List pending further action. U.S. persons are still broadly prohibited from transacting with these addresses.

– Ongoing Legal Complexity: A parallel Eleventh Circuit case and potential appeals could escalate the issue to the Supreme Court, leaving the ultimate fate of these sanctions uncertain.

– Regulatory Tension: The ruling underscores the difficulty of applying existing sanctions laws to decentralized technologies, possibly prompting new legislative or regulatory measures.

– Risk to Users: Anyone engaging with sanctioned Tornado Cash addresses—knowingly or unknowingly—faces potential legal repercussions, including heavy fines and other sanctions.

Key Q&A Highlights

What Is Tornado Cash?
A privacy-focused Ethereum mixer alleged to launder billions in illicit funds.

Why Did the Fifth Circuit Overturn Part of the Sanctions?
It held that immutable smart contracts are not “property” because no one can own or control them.

Are Sanctions Still in Effect?
Yes. Tornado Cash’s addresses remain sanctioned on the SDN List, and OFAC has not yet removed them.

Legal Next Steps:
The ruling may be appealed, and parallel court cases could produce a circuit split, potentially leading to Supreme Court review.

On November 26, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a landmark ruling in Van Loon et al. v. Department of the Treasury, challenging the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s designation of Tornado Cash—a popular yet controversial cryptocurrency mixing service—on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (“SDN List”). This decision has attracted significant attention for its implications on how decentralized technologies and immutable smart contracts can (or cannot) be sanctioned under existing U.S. law.

Below, we explore how Tornado Cash became a target of sanctions, the court’s rationale in striking down OFAC’s designation of immutable smart contracts, and the looming question: Will the government remove the Tornado Cash addresses from the SDN List?

Background: Tornado Cash and Its OFAC Designation

1. What Is Tornado Cash?
Tornado Cash is an open-source, decentralized software protocol that uses “smart contracts” on the Ethereum blockchain to mix cryptocurrencies, obfuscating the transaction trail between senders and recipients. Tornado Cash offers:

– Privacy: Users deposit their crypto assets into a “pool,” withdraw them to new addresses, thus breaking the public chain of custody.
– Autonomy: Its immutable smart contracts, once deployed, cannot be controlled, altered, or owned by any single entity.

2. OFAC’s Initial Sanctions
On August 8, 2022, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Tornado Cash, alleging that it had been used to launder over $7 billion in illicit funds—most notably, $455 million allegedly stolen by the North Korean Lazarus Group.1 OFAC’s action placed Tornado Cash and numerous Ethereum addresses associated with its smart contracts on the SDN List.

3. Legal Challenges
Soon after OFAC’s designation, a group of Tornado Cash users (financially backed by Coinbase) sued, arguing that immutable smart contracts, which cannot be owned or controlled, are not “property” and therefore fall outside the scope of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This challenge culminated in the Fifth Circuit’s November 2024 ruling, which overturned the designation related to Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts.

The Fifth Circuit’s Decision: Why Immutable Smart Contracts Are Not “Property”

In Van Loon et al. v. Department of the Treasury, the court concluded that Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts:

Lack Ownership and Control
- – IEEPA requires that sanctioned “property” be capable of being owned or controlled by someone.
- – Immutable smart contracts operate autonomously on the blockchain and cannot be changed or withdrawn by any individual or entity.
Cannot Be Excluded from Public Use
- – A key feature of “ownership” often includes the right to exclude others.
- – Because anyone with an internet connection can use these immutable contracts, they are not subject to traditional property rights.
Are Not “Services” Provided by Tornado Cash
- – OFAC tried to argue that these smart contracts fell under its expansive definition of “property” or “property interests.”
- The Fifth Circuit found that they merely facilitate a “mixing” function and are not themselves “services” that Tornado Cash (or anyone else) owns or provides.

This reasoning placed real limitations on OFAC’s authority, at least with regard to truly immutable smart contracts.

Do the Tornado Cash Addresses Remain on the SDN List?

Despite the court’s decision striking down the designation of immutable contracts, several factors cloud the question of whether OFAC will actually remove these addresses from the SDN List:

Ongoing Legal Uncertainty
- – The Treasury Department could appeal the ruling.
- – A parallel challenge is pending in the Eleventh Circuit (Coin Center, et al. v. Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al.), where a lower court initially upheld OFAC’s actions.
- – A circuit split could escalate the issue to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Partial Scope
- – The Fifth Circuit ruling focused specifically on immutable smart contracts, not mutable contracts that Tornado Cash or any group of developers might control.
- – OFAC retains the authority to sanction any person or entity—human or corporate—that facilitates illicit transactions, so it is not obligated to delist the addresses until it takes separate administrative action.
Existing Framework Remains
- – OFAC’s broader sanctions regime against the founders of Tornado Cash or any user who intentionally launders illicit funds still stands.
- – The core principle of “strict liability” for sanctions violations remains intact, meaning U.S. persons (or foreign persons dealing in U.S. jurisdictions) must still tread carefully.

At this juncture, OFAC has not announced the removal of any Tornado Cash Ethereum addresses from its SDN List. Until or unless OFAC issues official guidance reversing or updating its listings, the addresses remain under sanction. Businesses and individuals should not assume they can freely interact with these addresses without risk.

Tornado Cash Addresses on the SDN List

As of the last published update, the following Ethereum addresses remain associated with the Tornado Cash designation. Users should treat all dealings with these addresses as potentially sanctionable:

– 0x12D66f87A04A9E220743712cE6d9bB1B5616B8Fc
– 0x47CE0C6eD5B0Ce3d3A51fdb1C52DC66a7c3c2936

– 0x910Cbd523D972eb0a6f4cAe4618aD62622b39DbF
– 0xA160cdAB225685dA1d56aa342Ad8841c3b53f291
– 0xD4B88Df4D29F5CedD6857912842cff3b20C8Cfa3

View All

Key Takeaways for Crypto and DeFi Participants

Mutability Matters
- – The Fifth Circuit’s decision is narrow and specifically concerns immutable smart contracts. If a protocol or developer group can still update the code, that contract could be subject to sanction.
Regulatory Risks Remain
- – Even if the government ultimately removes Tornado Cash’s immutable contracts from the SDN List, other aspects of the protocol (including developers, founders, or controlled contracts) may stay sanctioned.
- – Users who intentionally engage with sanctioned entities to launder money can still face serious legal consequences.
Potential Legislative Update
- – The court emphasized the difficulty in applying older laws like IEEPA to modern blockchain technology.
- – We may see Congress or regulatory agencies move to fill the gap, potentially introducing more tailored legislation for decentralized protocols.
Multifaceted Sanctions Framework
- – Nothing in this ruling prevents OFAC from designating other mixers or addresses under different legal rationales, especially if they are mutable, controlled by identified persons, or used by known illicit actors.

Conclusion

The Fifth Circuit’s recent ruling on Tornado Cash marks a watershed moment in the evolving relationship between decentralized finance (DeFi) and U.S. sanctions law. By holding that immutable smart contracts cannot be considered “property” under IEEPA, the court has significantly limited OFAC’s ability to target certain decentralized technologies. However, the ruling leaves many legal questions unresolved and remains subject to appeal. Until OFAC updates its designations, all listed Tornado Cash addresses remain on the SDN List—and U.S. persons are still broadly prohibited from engaging in transactions with those addresses.

Whether OFAC will remove any of the sanctioned Tornado Cash addresses now hinges on continued litigation, possible appeals, and the Treasury Department’s administrative actions. In the meantime, the case underscores the tension between protecting privacy, fostering innovation, and preventing illicit financing in the ever-changing world of crypto.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What is Tornado Cash, and why was it sanctioned?
A: Tornado Cash is an open-source mixing protocol on the Ethereum blockchain. It was sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in August 2022 for allegedly facilitating the laundering of more than $7 billion in illicit cryptocurrency, including funds stolen by the North Korean Lazarus Group.

Q: How did the Fifth Circuit’s decision affect the sanctions on Tornado Cash?
A: In Van Loon et al. v. Department of the Treasury, the Fifth Circuit held that immutable smart contracts associated with Tornado Cash are not “property” under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This ruling limits OFAC’s authority to sanction certain decentralized technologies, although it does not fully remove Tornado Cash from the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List.

Q: Are Tornado Cash’s Ethereum addresses still on the SDN List?
A: Yes. Despite the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, OFAC has not removed any Tornado Cash Ethereum addresses from the SDN List. Until OFAC takes further action, U.S. persons and entities remain prohibited from dealing with these addresses.

Q: Does the ruling mean it’s now legal to use Tornado Cash?
A: No. The decision only addressed whether immutable smart contracts can be sanctioned as “property.” All Tornado Cash addresses on the SDN List remain sanctioned, and U.S. persons are still subject to potential penalties if they transact with them.

Q: Why does “immutability” matter in this case?
A: An immutable smart contract cannot be altered, controlled, or owned by any individual or group after deployment. The Fifth Circuit concluded that such autonomous code is not “property” under IEEPA because it lacks the element of control that typically defines ownership.

Q: What risks do crypto users face if they interact with sanctioned addresses?
A: Anyone—U.S. persons or otherwise—who transacts with sanctioned addresses could be in violation of U.S. sanctions laws. Violations can result in severe penalties, including fines and other legal consequences, even if the user unknowingly interacts with a sanctioned address.

Q: What happens next for Tornado Cash and OFAC?
A: The Treasury Department may appeal the Fifth Circuit ruling, or a similar case in another jurisdiction (the Eleventh Circuit) could create a circuit split. Any final outcome may prompt OFAC to revise its stance or lead to new legislation clarifying sanctions authority over decentralized protocols.

Q: How does this ruling impact the broader crypto and DeFi space?
A: The ruling suggests that U.S. sanctions laws might not seamlessly apply to certain decentralized, autonomous technologies. However, mutable smart contracts, project developers, or platform operators can still face sanctions. This drives home the point that legal and regulatory clarity remains a top concern for the DeFi industry.

All current Tornado Cash OFAC listed addresses:

– 0x12D66f87A04A9E220743712cE6d9bB1B5616B8Fc
– 0x47CE0C6eD5B0Ce3d3A51fdb1C52DC66a7c3c2936
– 0x910Cbd523D972eb0a6f4cAe4618aD62622b39DbF
– 0xA160cdAB225685dA1d56aa342Ad8841c3b53f291
– 0xD4B88Df4D29F5CedD6857912842cff3b20C8Cfa3
– 0xFD8610d20aA15b7B2E3Be39B396a1bC3516c7144
– 0x07687e702b410Fa43f4cB4Af7FA097918ffD2730
– 0x23773E65ed146A459791799d01336DB287f25334
– 0x22aaA7720ddd5388A3c0A3333430953C68f1849b
– 0x03893a7c7463AE47D46bc7f091665f1893656003
– 0x2717c5e28cf931547B621a5dddb772Ab6A35B701
– 0xD21be7248e0197Ee08E0c20D4a96DEBdaC3D20Af
– 0x4736dCf1b7A3d580672CcE6E7c65cd5cc9cFBa9D
– 0xDD4c48C0B24039969fC16D1cdF626eaB821d3384
– 0xd96f2B1c14Db8458374d9Aca76E26c3D18364307
– 0x169AD27A470D064DEDE56a2D3ff727986b15D52B
– 0x0836222F2B2B24A3F36f98668Ed8F0B38D1a872f
– 0x178169B423a011fff22B9e3F3abeA13414dDD0F1
– 0x610B717796ad172B316836AC95a2ffad065CeaB4
– 0xbB93e510BbCD0B7beb5A853875f9eC60275CF498
– 0x84443CFd09A48AF6eF360C6976C5392aC5023a1F
– 0xd47438C816c9E7f2E2888E060936a499Af9582b3
– 0x330bdFADE01eE9bF63C209Ee33102DD334618e0a
– 0x1E34A77868E19A6647b1f2F47B51ed72dEDE95DD
– 0xdf231d99Ff8b6c6CBF4E9B9a945CBAcEF9339178
– 0xaf4c0B70B2Ea9FB7487C7CbB37aDa259579fe040
– 0xa5C2254e4253490C54cef0a4347fddb8f75A4998
– 0xaf8d1839c3c67cf571aa74B5c12398d4901147B3
– 0x6Bf694a291DF3FeC1f7e69701E3ab6c592435Ae7
– 0x3aac1cC67c2ec5Db4eA850957b967Ba153aD6279
– 0x723B78e67497E85279CB204544566F4dC5d2acA0
– 0x0E3A09dDA6B20aFbB34aC7cD4A6881493f3E7bf7
– 0x76D85B4C0Fc497EeCc38902397aC608000A06607
– 0xCC84179FFD19A1627E79F8648d09e095252Bc418
– 0xD5d6f8D9e784d0e26222ad3834500801a68D027D
– 0x407CcEeaA7c95d2FE2250Bf9F2c105aA7AAFB512
– 0x833481186f16Cece3f1Eeea1a694c42034c3a0dB
– 0xd8D7DE3349ccaA0Fde6298fe6D7b7d0d34586193
– 0x8281Aa6795aDE17C8973e1aedcA380258Bc124F9
– 0x57b2B8c82F065de8Ef5573f9730fC1449B403C9f
– 0x05E0b5B40B7b66098C2161A5EE11C5740A3A7C45
– 0x23173fE8b96A4Ad8d2E17fB83EA5dcccdCa1Ae52
– 0x538Ab61E8A9fc1b2f93b3dd9011d662d89bE6FE6
– 0x94Be88213a387E992Dd87DE56950a9aef34b9448
– 0x242654336ca2205714071898f67E254EB49ACdCe
– 0x776198CCF446DFa168347089d7338879273172cF
– 0xeDC5d01286f99A066559F60a585406f3878a033e
– 0xD692Fd2D0b2Fbd2e52CFa5B5b9424bC981C30696
– 0xca0840578f57fe71599d29375e16783424023357
– 0xDF3A408c53E5078af6e8fb2A85088D46Ee09A61b
– 0x743494b60097A2230018079c02fe21a7B687EAA5
– 0x94C92F096437ab9958fC0A37F09348f30389Ae79
– 0x5efda50f22d34F262c29268506C5Fa42cB56A1Ce
– 0x2f50508a8a3d323b91336fa3ea6ae50e55f32185
– 0xCEe71753C9820f063b38FDbE4cFDAf1d3D928A80
– 0xffbac21a641dcfe4552920138d90f3638b3c9fba
– 0x179f48c78f57a3a78f0608cc9197b8972921d1d2
– 0xb04E030140b30C27bcdfaafFFA98C57d80eDa7B4
– 0x77777feddddffc19ff86db637967013e6c6a116c
– 0x3efa30704d2b8bbac821307230376556cf8cc39e
– 0x746aebc06d2ae31b71ac51429a19d54e797878e9
– 0xd90e2f925DA726b50C4Ed8D0Fb90Ad053324F31b
– 0x5f6c97C6AD7bdd0AE7E0Dd4ca33A4ED3fDabD4D7
– 0xf4B067dD14e95Bab89Be928c07Cb22E3c94E0DAA
– 0x58E8dCC13BE9780fC42E8723D8EaD4CF46943dF2
– 0x01e2919679362dFBC9ee1644Ba9C6da6D6245BB1
– 0x2FC93484614a34f26F7970CBB94615bA109BB4bf
– 0x26903a5a198D571422b2b4EA08b56a37cbD68c89
– 0xB20c66C4DE72433F3cE747b58B86830c459CA911
– 0x2573BAc39EBe2901B4389CD468F2872cF7767FAF
– 0x527653eA119F3E6a1F5BD18fbF4714081D7B31ce
– 0x653477c392c16b0765603074f157314Cc4f40c32
– 0x88fd245fEdeC4A936e700f9173454D1931B4C307
– 0x09193888b3f38C82dEdfda55259A82C0E7De875E
– 0x5cab7692D4E94096462119ab7bF57319726Eed2A
– 0x756C4628E57F7e7f8a459EC2752968360Cf4D1AA
– 0x722122dF12D4e14e13Ac3b6895a86e84145b6967
– 0x94A1B5CdB22c43faab4AbEb5c74999895464Ddaf
– 0xb541fc07bC7619fD4062A54d96268525cBC6FfEF
– 0xD82ed8786D7c69DC7e052F7A542AB047971E73d2
– 0xF67721A2D8F736E75a49FdD7FAd2e31D8676542a
– 0x9AD122c22B14202B4490eDAf288FDb3C7cb3ff5E
– 0xD691F27f38B395864Ea86CfC7253969B409c362d
– 0xaEaaC358560e11f52454D997AAFF2c5731B6f8a6
– 0x1356c899D8C9467C7f71C195612F8A395aBf2f0a
– 0xA60C772958a3eD56c1F15dD055bA37AC8e523a0D
– 0xBA214C1c1928a32Bffe790263E38B4Af9bFCD659
– 0xb1C8094B234DcE6e03f10a5b673c1d8C69739A00
– 0xF60dD140cFf0706bAE9Cd734Ac3ae76AD9eBC32A
– 0x8589427373D6D84E98730D7795D8f6f8731FDA16

Crypto and Blockchain Scam Glossary

Crypto scams exploit trust, anonymity, and a general lack of industry regulation. In this post, we’ll explore common crypto scam terminology—from Pig Butchering (one of the most prevalent scams) to lesser-known schemes—and provide real-world examples to help you stay alert.

Glossary

Pig Butchering Scams
Rug Pull
Pump and Dump
Ponzi/ Pyramid Schemes
Phishing
Fake Airdrops & Giveaway Scams

Social Engineering/ Impersonation
SIM Swapping
Front-Running
Malware & Remote Access
Fake Exchange/ Broker
Exit Scams

Pig Butchering Scams

Pig Butchering is a long-con in which the scammer (“butcher”) forms a fake relationship with the victim (“pig”), often romantic or friendly. Over time, the scammer encourages the victim to invest in a fake or manipulated crypto scheme. Once the scammer deems the victim “fat” enough with trust and money, they disappear with all funds.

Example Situations

Romantic Approach
- You match with someone on a dating app.
- Over weeks, they share personal stories and “insider tips” about crypto.
- They convince you to invest in their special trading platform, and initially, you see fake profits.
- When you try to withdraw, both your money and your new “friend” vanish.
Business Mentorship
- A seemingly successful professional on LinkedIn starts offering “VIP investment advice.”
- You see screenshots of their “profits” and eventually deposit funds into a questionable exchange.
- The scammer then blocks you or the website suddenly goes offline.

Red Flags

– Rapid emotional connection paired with immediate investment proposals.
– Unrealistically high returns or secret “VIP” opportunities.
– Pressure to deposit large sums quickly.
– Sudden radio silence once you attempt a withdrawal.

Rug Pull

A Rug Pull happens when developers create a new token or DeFi project, hype it up, and encourage mass buying. Once the token’s price surges, the team drains liquidity or sells their holdings, causing the token price to crash.

Example Situation

A new token is promoted heavily on social media.
Early investors see rapid price increases, but the founding team suddenly sells off their entire stake.
The token’s value plummets, leaving investors with worthless coins.

Suspect fraud or need to investigate a suspicious transaction? FraudOptics can help. Our pioneering Commercial Risk Intelligence Platform and Expert Team uncovers the hidden connections between on- and off-chain data—exposing the true scope of any scam. Contact us today to protect your assets and stay one step ahead of fraud.

Pump and Dump

A Pump and Dump is a coordinated effort to purchase a large quantity of a low-cap token, spread hype (often via social media), and inflate the price artificially. When enough new investors buy in, the perpetrators sell off their tokens, causing the price to crash.

Example Situation

A Telegram group claims they have insider info about a major exchange listing.
Members rush to buy the coin, creating a spike in value.
The group admins then sell at the peak, leaving latecomers holding the bag.

Ponzi / Pyramid Schemes

A Ponzi scheme pays existing investors with the capital of new investors. Eventually, when no new funds arrive, the scheme collapses. In crypto, these often appear as “high-yield investment programs.”

Example Situation

A platform promises 10% weekly returns.
Payouts to older members come directly from new members’ deposits.
When growth slows, withdrawals cease, and the entire scheme unravels.

Phishing Scams

Phishing involves masquerading as a trusted entity—an exchange, wallet provider, or official support team—to trick you into revealing private information such as login details or seed phrases.

Example Situation

You receive an urgent email from “Binance” saying your account has been compromised.
The link directs you to a fake login page that steals your credentials.

Fake Airdrops & Giveaway Scams

Scammers promise free tokens (airdrops) or giveaways but require you to connect your wallet or send a small “activation fee.” You either lose funds, grant malicious smart contracts access, or both.

Example Situation

A tweet announces a “limited-time” free token drop.
You connect your MetaMask and approve a transaction.
Scammers drain your funds or compromise your wallet.

Social Engineering / Impersonation

Social engineering relies on psychological manipulation. Scammers impersonate support staff, project admins, or community members to coerce you into revealing private information or sending funds.

Example Situation

You comment on a crypto forum about a wallet issue.
Someone posing as “official support” DMs you, requesting your seed phrase.
They drain your wallet within minutes.

SIM Swapping

SIM Swapping is when a fraudster convinces your phone carrier to transfer your phone number to their SIM. They then bypass two-factor authentication or password resets, accessing your exchange accounts.

Example Situation

Your phone unexpectedly loses service.
The scammer uses your number to reset exchange logins.
Funds are withdrawn before you can regain control of your account.

Front-Running Scams (DeFi)

Malicious front-running bots scan pending blockchain transactions and insert higher-fee trades just before yours, profiting from the price movements you trigger.

Example Situation

You place a large buy order on a DEX.
A bot pays extra gas to front-run your order, buying cheaper and then instantly selling at a higher price once your order goes through.

Malware & Remote Access Scams

Scammers distribute crypto-focused malware or convince victims to install remote access software, allowing them to hijack wallet addresses or control the entire device.

Example Situation

You download a “free trading bot” from an unverified website.
It includes a clipboard hijacker that swaps your wallet address for the scammer’s whenever you send funds.

Fake Exchange / Broker Scams

A Fake Exchange or Broker Scam involves cybercriminals creating a highly professional-looking website or mobile app that appears nearly identical to a legitimate trading platform. The design often includes accurate-looking real-time price charts, flashy marketing materials, and claims of quick, effortless returns. Scammers are meticulous in crafting the user interface, featuring well-designed dashboards, instant notifications, and even fake trade volume to convince unsuspecting visitors that they are engaging with a real, reputable exchange.

Once victims deposit funds—whether in cryptocurrency or traditional currency—these platforms either prevent withdrawals entirely or subject users to a series of dubious requirements and “fees” before finalizing any withdrawal request. Common excuses include “verification pending,” “platform maintenance,” or “compliance checks.” In many cases, the withdrawal interface will show repeated delays or remain indefinitely “under review,” prompting victims to pay extra for expedited processing or “tax fees.” By the time users realize the withdrawal obstacle is insurmountable, the scam site typically goes offline or blocks access, leaving victims unable to recover their funds.

Example Situation

Polished Web Platform
- You discover a sleek website—XYZExchange.org—advertising competitive trading fees and seamless crypto/fiat deposits.
- The site features a busy “order book,” real-time charts, and even a list of trading pairs that mimic those on major exchanges.
Initial Deposit & Trading Success
- Intrigued, you deposit a small amount of BTC to test the platform.
- After placing a few trades, you seemingly make a profit and see your balance increase on the platform dashboard.
- Because of the initial “success,” you feel confident and deposit even more funds.
Suspicious Withdrawal Delays
- Eventually, you decide to withdraw your BTC or cash out some gains.
- The withdrawal request is marked as “under review.” Days pass, and there is no progress.
- A support representative contacts you, claiming you need to pay a “verification fee” or “tax fee” to proceed.
Site Suddenly Disappears
- You reluctantly pay additional charges, hoping it will allow you to withdraw.
- The platform continues to block your request or provides new reasons you must pay more.
- As doubts grow, you try to contact support again, only to find they have deactivated their live chat or removed the site entirely.

Typical Red Flags

– Overly Professional but Unverified: A visually stunning website that lacks genuine reviews, social media presence, or any verifiable corporate background.
– No Real Regulation: Claimed licenses or certifications often can’t be verified with official regulatory bodies (e.g., SEC, FCA).
– Excessive ‘Fees’: Repeated demands for administrative or clearance fees before releasing funds.
– Lack of Transparency: Hidden or vague ownership information, with no official company registration details.
– Hyped Marketing: Promises of guaranteed returns or substantial profits in a short time, a major red flag in any legitimate financial market.

How to Protect Yourself

– Check Licenses and Registration: Real exchanges provide verifiable information on regulatory approval and corporate identity.
– Look for Reviews: Search forums like Reddit or reputable crypto review websites to read user experiences.
– Use Trusted Platforms: Stick with well-known exchanges that have a track record of successful operation, responsive customer support, and comprehensive security measures.
– Test Before Trusting: If you must try a new platform, start with a very small amount and attempt an immediate withdrawal to verify legitimacy.
– Be Skeptical of High Returns: Anything promising low risk and high, guaranteed profits is almost certainly a scam.

In summary, Fake Exchange / Broker Scams rely on creating a deceptive sense of authenticity through professional design and false trading data. The criminals behind these scams know that once people see “profits,” they will be more inclined to deposit larger amounts. Recognizing the warning signs early—such as endless withdrawal hurdles and excessive fees—can save you from substantial financial losses.

Exit Scams

In an Exit Scam, a previously “legitimate” project suddenly disappears with user funds. This can occur with lending platforms, mining operations, or NFT marketplaces.

Example Situation

A well-marketed cloud mining company pays out for a few weeks.
Suddenly, withdrawals halt, and the team deletes all social media.
Investors are left with nothing.

Conclusion

Crypto scams are constantly evolving, and pig butchering stands out for its emotional manipulation and the level of trust it builds before stealing funds. Recognizing the red flags can save you or your community from significant losses. If you ever feel pressured to invest or are promised unrealistic gains, take a step back, do thorough research, and remember: if it sounds too good to be true, it likely is.

Cryptocurrency-Related Crimes: Navigating the Gaps in U.S. Government Enforcement

Cryptocurrency, once heralded as a beacon of financial innovation, has emerged as a double-edged sword. While its potential for revolutionizing economies is undeniable, its misuse in criminal activities has raised concerns worldwide. Unfortunately, it appears that the U.S. government is struggling to keep pace with the growing tide of cryptocurrency-related crimes, leaving significant gaps in enforcement.

As the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, bad actors have swiftly adapted to exploit its inherent complexities. Money laundering, fraud, and cybercrimes have found a fertile ground within this digital realm, posing significant challenges for law enforcement agencies. Despite this stark reality, the U.S. government’s response seems to be lagging, jeopardizing the integrity of the financial system.

One key issue lies in the lack of specialized expertise within government agencies. The intricate nature of cryptocurrencies demands a deep understanding of blockchain technology, cryptography, and the evolving methods employed by cybercriminals. However, many law enforcement officers lack the necessary training and knowledge to tackle these crimes effectively.

Moreover, the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies presents jurisdictional challenges. Criminal activities conducted online often transcend geographical boundaries, making it difficult for individual agencies to coordinate and investigate cases that span multiple jurisdictions. As a result, criminals can exploit this fragmentation to evade capture and prosecution.

In response to the mounting challenges posed by cryptocurrency-related crimes, FraudOptics has emerged as a pioneering solution, wielding the power of on-chain and off-chain data to combat fraud and enhance security in the digital realm. By harnessing the potential of cutting-edge technology, our company is at the forefront of addressing the gaps in the investigation and prosecution of cryptocurrency-related offenses.

Through a seamless integration of on-chain and off-chain data, FraudOptics ensures a comprehensive view of cryptocurrency transactions, leaving no room for illicit activities to remain hidden. Our sophisticated algorithms analyze the blockchain, tracing the flow of funds across various wallets and platforms. Simultaneously, we tap into off-chain data sources, leveraging a vast network of information to corroborate and enrich our insights.

A defining feature of FraudOptics is our innovative risk scoring system for crypto wallets. We meticulously evaluate transactions, patterns, and behaviors to assign risk scores ranging from 0 to 100. This empowers organizations, law enforcement agencies, and financial institutions to make informed decisions swiftly. Wallets associated with suspicious activities are identified promptly, enabling proactive interventions that disrupt criminal operations.

Our approach doesn’t merely stop at identification; it extends to prevention and mitigation. By providing real-time risk assessment and continuous monitoring, FraudOptics equips clients with the tools to thwart potential threats before they materialize. Our solution bridges the gap between the complexity of cryptocurrency transactions and the need for efficient enforcement, empowering authorities to stay ahead of criminals in this rapidly evolving landscape.

FraudOptics’ commitment to transparency, security, and collaboration ensures that we contribute to the collective effort of creating a safer digital space. By enabling effective investigation, prosecution, and risk management, we strive to reshape the narrative surrounding cryptocurrency-related crimes, inspiring confidence and trust in the innovative potential of blockchain technology.